Comments on: .Net Application Generator

By: Chris Cordes

Chris Cordes — Mon, 19 Apr 2010 15:03:39 +0000

Thanks for the update, Robert! It sounds like it is finally coming together.
I’d like to weigh in on the side of caution as to the ‘early” release idea.
I think you should not jump the gun and release something where you need to continually make excuses and explanation as to what’s missing and what’s coming, etc etc. It always seems to side track your efforts rather than support them. It is hard, as much as I like to get the new toys, and as much as you folks like to send them, but stay the course. Early release is a distraction to your development team. Send us screen shots, more blogs, and samples. Then release it with all the tie-in in place.
That way when we find a problem or bug it isn’t just alerting you to the obvious. To which you answer – Oh that’s being added, fixed, removed in the next release already.
Just my 2¢
ccordes

By: Angel Bermudez

Angel Bermudez — Mon, 19 Apr 2010 01:50:13 +0000

This is great look forward to the C# template writer. I like Clarion# but I love C#.

Please hurry with some samples, any code snippets would be greatly appreciated.

By: rzaunere

rzaunere — Fri, 16 Apr 2010 17:43:37 +0000

As soon as we have the rough spots ironed out we’ll be looking into adding Clarion# as a template language.

By: rzaunere

rzaunere — Fri, 16 Apr 2010 17:42:25 +0000

The .App which is an XML file holds properties for the templates which in turn are associated with physical source files. Depending on the model you choose there can be multiple projects created; DAL, Business logic, etc. So yes, working with version control systems will be very comfortable.

By: Jan K. van Dalen

Jan K. van Dalen — Wed, 14 Apr 2010 02:13:04 +0000

Thanks for the update …

Could you please share on how a solution will be organized? IOW, is this application going to be contain under a single .APP? or will “modules/Procedures” be separated into its own file … so that versioning will be easy at that level?