<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Template Tips #3 &#8211; #ATEND vs #AT(%AfterGeneratedApplication)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://clarionsharp.com/blog/2010/03/template-tips-3-atend-vs-ataftergeneratedapplication/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://clarionsharp.com/blog/2010/03/template-tips-3-atend-vs-ataftergeneratedapplication/</link>
	<description>Simply the fastest tool available for creating custom database applications!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 19:27:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diego Borojovich</title>
		<link>http://clarionsharp.com/blog/2010/03/template-tips-3-atend-vs-ataftergeneratedapplication/comment-page-1/#comment-395</link>
		<dc:creator>Diego Borojovich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 16:04:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clarionsharp.com/blog/?p=602#comment-395</guid>
		<description>Hi,
Basically the person that write templates need to know what he/she is writing the template for and how that template behaves.
The %AfterGeneratedApplication is not a template symbol but an embed and the only way to get to know the embeds is to check the templates, that is something that a template writer should do anyways. The #ATEND is documented because it is part of the template language but maybe some documentation can be added about the embeds symbols.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
Basically the person that write templates need to know what he/she is writing the template for and how that template behaves.<br />
The %AfterGeneratedApplication is not a template symbol but an embed and the only way to get to know the embeds is to check the templates, that is something that a template writer should do anyways. The #ATEND is documented because it is part of the template language but maybe some documentation can be added about the embeds symbols.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Graham Dawson</title>
		<link>http://clarionsharp.com/blog/2010/03/template-tips-3-atend-vs-ataftergeneratedapplication/comment-page-1/#comment-394</link>
		<dc:creator>Graham Dawson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 11:31:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clarionsharp.com/blog/?p=602#comment-394</guid>
		<description>One thing that struck me reading the blog was that there is no documentation 
of the shipping templates symbols.

What I mean is you can search the Clarion Help and the \Docs folder and find 
information on the built in template symbols, but you won&#039;t find

%AfterGeneratedApplication

because that&#039;s a symbol in one of the shipping template set and none of them (unless I&#039;m missing something) are documented.

It would surely help users creating their own templates if these shipping 
template symbols and embed points were documented together with how to 
&#039;properly&#039; use them.

Their mis-use seems to have been the cause of some of the C6 to C7 
conversion issues.

Graham</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing that struck me reading the blog was that there is no documentation<br />
of the shipping templates symbols.</p>
<p>What I mean is you can search the Clarion Help and the \Docs folder and find<br />
information on the built in template symbols, but you won&#8217;t find</p>
<p>%AfterGeneratedApplication</p>
<p>because that&#8217;s a symbol in one of the shipping template set and none of them (unless I&#8217;m missing something) are documented.</p>
<p>It would surely help users creating their own templates if these shipping<br />
template symbols and embed points were documented together with how to<br />
&#8216;properly&#8217; use them.</p>
<p>Their mis-use seems to have been the cause of some of the C6 to C7<br />
conversion issues.</p>
<p>Graham</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

