<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Release update</title>
	<atom:link href="http://clarionsharp.com/blog/2009/12/release-update/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://clarionsharp.com/blog/2009/12/release-update/</link>
	<description>Simply the fastest tool available for creating custom database applications!</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 14:44:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joe Tailleur</title>
		<link>http://clarionsharp.com/blog/2009/12/release-update/comment-page-1/#comment-320</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Tailleur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 16:57:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clarionsharp.com/blog/?p=275#comment-320</guid>
		<description>Hi Robert,

Could we get an updated release schedule please?  We all know how timelines slide on projects; but I am anxiously awaiting some of the fixes that have already went out in prelease form (I was not one of the fortunate few).  I appreciate the amount of fixes coming in the next version, but I personally would have loved a few interm releases to get past some issues months ago.

Joe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Robert,</p>
<p>Could we get an updated release schedule please?  We all know how timelines slide on projects; but I am anxiously awaiting some of the fixes that have already went out in prelease form (I was not one of the fortunate few).  I appreciate the amount of fixes coming in the next version, but I personally would have loved a few interm releases to get past some issues months ago.</p>
<p>Joe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rzaunere</title>
		<link>http://clarionsharp.com/blog/2009/12/release-update/comment-page-1/#comment-317</link>
		<dc:creator>rzaunere</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 20:54:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clarionsharp.com/blog/?p=275#comment-317</guid>
		<description>The linker has been improved in 7.1, in prior releases link order could mask duplicate symbol errors. 
I'll post about it and go into more detail.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The linker has been improved in 7.1, in prior releases link order could mask duplicate symbol errors.<br />
I&#8217;ll post about it and go into more detail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ubaidullah Nubar</title>
		<link>http://clarionsharp.com/blog/2009/12/release-update/comment-page-1/#comment-316</link>
		<dc:creator>Ubaidullah Nubar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 09:32:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clarionsharp.com/blog/?p=275#comment-316</guid>
		<description>"CHANGE: FILEs declared within a Procedure are now Private data to that Procedure"

Hasn't it always been like that ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;CHANGE: FILEs declared within a Procedure are now Private data to that Procedure&#8221;</p>
<p>Hasn&#8217;t it always been like that ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Peltzer</title>
		<link>http://clarionsharp.com/blog/2009/12/release-update/comment-page-1/#comment-315</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Peltzer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 04:58:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clarionsharp.com/blog/?p=275#comment-315</guid>
		<description>Thank you, I love to read articles that are informative and beneficial in nature.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, I love to read articles that are informative and beneficial in nature.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Roos</title>
		<link>http://clarionsharp.com/blog/2009/12/release-update/comment-page-1/#comment-313</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Roos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 01:08:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clarionsharp.com/blog/?p=275#comment-313</guid>
		<description>Maybe next time the duration could be posted in "working day" units?  2 "work weeks"  (and the 'work' was not included) is sort of vague.

Maybe there won't even be a 'next time'?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe next time the duration could be posted in &#8220;working day&#8221; units?  2 &#8220;work weeks&#8221;  (and the &#8216;work&#8217; was not included) is sort of vague.</p>
<p>Maybe there won&#8217;t even be a &#8216;next time&#8217;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
